欢迎参加第76期“我来读文献”活动
本期活动关注话题：学科身份：学术话语中的个体与共同体
身份研究一直是应用语言学领域的重要议题。本书以学术语篇为载体，论述学术作者如何在学术话语中构建学科身份，揭示身份与个体、共同体之间的关系。
全书共九章。第一、二章分别综述身份和学科的概念与表征。第三章评述身份研究的主要方法，包括会话分析、批评话语分析和叙事分析，作者提出将语料库与身份研究相结合能弥补这三种研究方法的不足。第四至八章通过对表现类体裁、学术传记、学生写作、资深学者的学术文章和书评等学术体裁的分析，探究学术话语中学科身份的构建。第九章总结身份与学术话语的联系及其对学术写作的启示，点明语料库对身份研究的方法论意义，指出未来的研究方向。
本书结构清晰、内容丰富、逻辑严谨、论述深刻、例证充分，是应用语言学领域的一部佳作，对从事话语分析和学术写作研究的专家、学者和一线教师均有裨益。
报名方式：
添加iResearcher（微信号fltrpteacher）为好友，注明：姓名+学校+76期我来读文献活动”，iResearcher将尽快邀您加入活动班级群。
点评问题：
1. Identity has been a hot topic for 10 years now. How does Hyland define it and do you agree with him? How would you challenge his view?
2. Hyland proposes the terms proximity and positioning to discuss the 2 sides of identity—the tension between belonging to a group and being an individual member of it. Is this a useful categorisation?
3. Is the idea of discipline a useful one or has it been replaced by interdisciplinary work? Do you see yourself as a member of a discipline and how does this influence your work and sense of yourself?
4. Do you agree with Hyland’s criticisms of alternative approaches to identity? What advantages does a corpus approach bring to the study of identity? Do you agree with Hyland’s claims about using corpus for this kind of research?
5. Hyland selects 3 genres to discuss sites where we can explicitly represent ourselves. Which one best allows this kind of representation? Why? Are there others? Are all genres ‘representational’ in this way?
6. Have you ever written a bio? Do you agree with Hyland’s analysis? Which of the different approaches to bios do you find most convincing?
7. Chapter 6 is about how we understand academic conventions in English and how culture might influence this. What are your own feelings about writing conventions in English? Do you use ‘I’ in your writing? Look at a piece of writing you have done and see if you can identify how you have used it using Hyland’s categories.
8. What is Hyland trying to do in Chapter 7? Why do you think he chose these 2 writers? Do you find Cameron or Swales identity position more effective? Which one are you closer to in your writing?
9. Do men and women write differently? Why should there be gender differences in academic writing? Is the book review a good genre to explore these differences or would another be better?
10. At the beginning of Chapter 9, Hyland admits that any stretch of language allows for multiple interpretations. Can we ever be sure that our interpretation is correct? How convincing to you find Hyland's argument in the book? What weaknesses can you find?
京公网安备：11010802020838号
京ICP备18030989号-2
