iReasearch学术科研网

摘要：胡建华(2007)提出语言可以区分为格标语言和非格标语言。NP格标与否对其题元解读以及句法分布产生影响。胡建华(2010)根据汉语无格假设;为汉语中显著性和局部性交互作用所致的"无选择性"论元分布特点作出了说明。本文依照汉语无格假设;进一步指出汉语中句法—语义—语用接口运算存在三种情况;并根据这三种情况为汉语话题句和涉格句的生成提供了解释。关于涉格结构;文章还认为;Pylkknen(2008)所说的涉格中心语就句法而言可以归结为零形态介词;跨语言来看;涉用操作可以一致解释为接口运算;一种语言是否可以按规约允准涉格句和该语言中的格标效应有关。

It is pointed out in Hu(2007) that a distinction can be drawn between Case-marking and non-Case-marking languages.Whether an NP is Case-marked or not in a language produces impact on thematic reading and syntactic positioning.Based on the notion that Chinese is a non-Case-marking language,Hu(2010) provides an account on how the characteristic unselectiveness manifested in argument distribution in many types of Chinese sentences may be a result of the interaction between prominence and locality.This paper further distinguishes between three cases of syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface computing and explains with reference to these distinctions how the topic sentence and the applicative construction in Chinese are generated.With respect to the latter,the paper argues that the applicative head posited in Pylkknen(2008)for the derivation of the construction is syntactically reducible to prepositions of zero morphology.The applicative operation seen cross-linguistically is essentially a kind of interface computing,and the licensing of applicative sentences in a language which is to a certain degree a matter of convention also has to do with Case marking effect.